Skip to content

Papers

A non sequitur indeed

A Non Sequitur cartoon ran in the Dallas Morning News on Sunday, March 8, 1998, which expressed in a funny way the basic attitude of religious pluralism. Here is a short article I wrote in response.

A Non Sequitur Indeed

Apologetics for this Secular Age

A paper presented at the annual conference of the International Society of Christian Apologetics April 23, 2010

Abstract:

The modern secularist, seeing the world through what Charles Taylor calls “the immanent frame”, has a particular set of assumptions that form a wall which makes belief difficult. Upon these assumptions are constructed arguments that serve to strengthen the wall. Our engagement with secularists is often characterized by little more than the clash of ideas; our arguments seem to just ricochet off the wall. It would be helpful, I believe, if we could find an approach that brings God’s truths to light that the secularist cannot deny, or cannot deny easily. Keeping foremost in our minds the person, rather than the ideas, and the goal of guiding the person to Christ, rather than winning arguments, can lead to a somewhat different way of doing apologetics than we’re used to.

R Wade Apologetics for this Secular Age

 

 Faithful Witness: Defense in the Context of the New Testament

A paper presented at the annual conference of the International Society of Christian Apologetics, April 6, 2013

Abstract:

Over time apologetics has become quite an elaborate affair. The term is now shorthand for almost any intellectual engagement with non-belief. A Scripture passage cited frequently as a justification for apologetics is 1 Peter 3:15. What would Peter have had in mind when he urged Christians to make a defense? Since apologia is a legal term, it is instructive to look at this Scripture passage in light of the larger witness motif in the New Testament. I conclude that defense in the New Testament, including the defense Peter had in mind, is incomplete by itself; it is in the service of bearing witness for Christ. Thus, there is no question of whether apologetics and evangelism go together; they are a package deal. I will draw primarily from A. A. Trites’ study, The Concept of Witness in the New Testament, and will conclude with a consideration of how this might color apologetics today.

Faithful Witness Rick Wade

 

Universalism: A Biblical and Theological Critique

A paper I wrote following the release of Rob Bell’s Love Wins.

RWade Universalism

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: